A Christian university in Texas seems to have lost the plot when it comes to abortion. Abilene Christian University (ACU) has told a campus pro-life group to take down an “abortion is murder” sign on the grounds that the message constituted “hate speech” despite the school’s written policies offering no objective criteria for what speech qualifies as hateful.

ACU says its mission is to “educate students for Christian service” as a “divine calling that enriches our global society, academic disciplines, the university, and the church to God’s glory,” with “exemplary teaching” that “informs and impacts issues of global importance to the academy, church, and society.”

The pro-life cause would seem a natural fit for the school, but as Campus Reform reported, the campus pro-life group ACU for Life learned differently on October 14 when school officials noticed a sign reading “Abortion is Murder. Disagree? Let’s talk” at their resource table. 

“You can’t have this,” dean for retention & student success Lyndi Felan told ACU for Life president Madelyne Arrowood, alongside assistant director of student services John Mark Moudy.

“How would you like us to rephrase it?” Arrowood asked. Felan responded simply, “Anything that is just not hate speech. I’m not going to write it for you.” Several students asked them to define hate speech, to no avail.

“You can get up or you can change the sign. Either way, it’s going to be a conduct issue,” Felan threatened before eventually approving the message, “Abortion Kills An Innocent Human Life.”

A taxpayer-funded pro-trans network is pushing sexual confusion on children as young as five. The James Lind Alliance (JLA) has been accused of peddling gender ideology in a survey of gender-confused children as young as five.

Canvassing the views of 5 to 17-year-olds in Britain, JLA asked participants for “questions you would like answered by research to help improve support and care” for “young gender diverse people”.

The pro-trans project is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

JLA describes itself as “a group of young gender diverse adults, parents, health and care professionals”.

The survey asked children who have “experienced gender diversity” to submit “a question, idea or experience” under the heading “Things that matter to me are…”

At the end of the survey, children were asked to indicate their gender; options included Male, Female, Non binary, I am not sure, and Other.

Children under the age of 14 only had to tick a box to indicate they had parental permission to complete the survey.

Millstones! Millstones and a deep sea.

The ‘Young UK Pro-Lifer of the Year’ has been awarded to a student for demonstrating “tremendous bravery in the face of appalling abuse”.

In a new annual award, ten pro-life organisations united to award the Charlie Kirk Cup in honour of the campaigner’s passion for the unborn and to shine “a light on the rising generation of pro-life leaders making an impact in their communities, universities, and across the nation”. Each organisation shortlisted three nominees between 16 and 32 years old, and following collective voting, three were selected for the award.

President of Manchester University’s Pro-Life Society Inge-Maria Botha won the Cup, with Barnabas Kahn and Bede Teeton taking second and third place. An award ceremony will be held in December.

When Manchester Pro-Life Society held its first meeting last year, screaming leftists howled that Inge should “get raped” as hundreds of aggressive activists had to be held back by the police.

Expressing thanks for the award, she said: “Leading a pro-life society comes with challenges, but I hope other students will see that every inconvenience or difficulty is worthwhile when we’re standing up for both mothers and their babies. I’m grateful to play even a small part in this very important cause.”

The parents of teenagers who committed suicide have slammed the disgraced doctor whose writings handed their disturbed children the means by which to end their lives.

The pro-assisted suicide campaigner, who invented the Sarco gas chamber assisted suicide pod, published material online that has been linked to the deaths of over 90 people in the United Kingdom, including the suicides of several teenagers. 

Dr Philip Nitschke, a former GP nicknamed ‘Dr Death’, said he published details of a lethal poison, which he described as offering a “cheap” and “reliable” method of achieving a “peaceful death”, in an online suicide “handbook”. 

Nitschke also said that he introduced the poison to Kenneth Law, a former chef who then began selling the poison and who has been linked to more than 90 deaths in the UK. Law is currently awaiting trial on 14 charges of first-degree murder and 14 counts of aiding and counselling suicide. 

Nitschke reportedly defended the actions of Law, claiming that he was only providing people with the choice of how to end their lives. “We published Ken Law’s contact details in the [online suicide handbook]”, Nitschke said, telling people that “Amazon don’t sell [the poison] anymore, go to Ken Law – and they did”.

“The information got on to the internet, younger people started to take it and die”, Nitschke said. “Now the parents of younger people who end their lives are understandably very distressed”. 

“They were very unhappy about us. They said ‘why did you publish that information?’”. Nitschke defended these actions, saying, “On end of life choices, I say a healthier society is where people know the information and can make informed decisions about how they act”.

David Parfett, whose 22-year-old son, Tom, bought the poison from Law and died as a result of ingesting it, said that his son used Nitschke’s research into suicide methods to inform his decision on how to end his life. 

“I know my son would still be alive and would have found the support he needed to get through his dark times if taking his own life hadn’t been encouraged as a valid option”, Parfett said. He continued, criticising Nitschke’s defence, saying he “openly encourages and facilitates people to take their own life”. 

“[Nitschke’s] research into suicide methods has been published in detail in books and online and was used by my son Tom to choose a suicide method and kill himself”, he said.

He continued, suggested that Nitschke and Law, by making it so easy to buy the poison online, had “effectively handed a loaded gun to my son”. 

Planned Parenthood is facing a crisis in California. The abort-for-profit business has announced the closure of seven of its California facilities due to new restrictions on federal funding but vows abortions will continue unaffected in the far-left state.

NBC 7 San Diego reports that Planned Parenthood of Orange & San Bernardino Counties (PPOSBC) will be closing locations in Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Mission Viejo, Santa Ana, Westminster, San Bernardino, and Upland effective December 10, laying off some 81 employees as a result of President Donald Trump’s so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (BBB), which contains a one-year ban on federal tax dollars going through Medicaid to entities that commits abortions for reasons other than rape, incest, or supposed threats to the mother’s life.

In a press release, PPOSBC describes the affected locations as offering “primary care services” but claims the BBB won’t impact its abortion operations since those receive funding from California’s far-left Democrat state government. “They came after abortion, but they’re taking away everything else that we do,” said PPOSBC President and Chief Executive Krista Hollinger.

Yet defunding all aspects of Planned Parenthood contributes to reducing the abortion giant’s overall profits and ability to continue operating, which in turn impacts its ability to continue abortions in the long run, as without Roe v. Wade to ensure abortion’s legality, the industry relies heavily on taxpayer funding to stay in operation.

Last year, Planned Parenthood’s most recent annual report revealed that its affiliates across the nation took in $699.3 million in government “health services” reimbursements and grants, accounting for 39 percent of its total revenue during that period. At the same time, the abortion chain committed 392,715 abortions – yet its non-abortion procedures, such as pap tests and cancer screenings, continued to decline as percentages of its overall business. 

A New York man, who admitted to murdering his parents because they “were losing their independence” as a result of old age, has called for the state to legalise assisted suicide.

Lorenz Kraus, who in September confessed on live television to murdering his parents and burying them in their garden, said “We need to widen up the law so that people can deal with these kind of problems in a humane way”. Kraus said that his parents’ old age and declining health made his decision necessary, and that he was acting out of “compassion” and “a sense of duty”. 

Kraus admitted to strangling his father and choking his mother with a rope, claiming that his “concern for their misery was paramount” to his decision to murder them. Kraus continued, “There are 40 million boomers. They’re all going to go through these kinds of [age-related] problems”. 

“I did my duty to my parents”, he said. 

Kraus’ confession comes in the midst of a debate around New York State legalising assisted suicide. The proposed legislation, which would provide the legal framework for terminally ill people to end their lives, recently passed, with 81 to 67 in the House of Representatives and 35 to 27 in the Senate.

Kraus’ comments regarding the rationale for allegedly murdering his parents echo statements made by proponents of the state’s assisted suicide Bill. The lead sponsor of the Bill, assembly member Amy Paulin, said the Bill would ease individuals’ “needless suffering”. Corinne Carey, a representative of the pro-assisted suicide campaign group Compassion & Choices, formerly known as the Hemlock Society, said those who voted in favour of the Bill are “leading with love”.

Abortion activists have called for unsafe DIY abortions to be further liberalised across the UK.

Staff from the University of Edinburgh’s Centre for Reproductive Health published a study in the BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health journal, reviewing abortions of ten to twelve-week-old unborn children in NHS Lothian from April 2020 to March 2025.

Since 97 per cent of 485 women had an abortion at home or in hospital without complications, the authors claimed that England, Wales and Northern Ireland should allow home abortions up to 12 weeks in line with Scotland. This is despite four serious cases which included heavy bleeding and infection.

The Christian Institute’s Head of Communications Angus Saul highlighted that since Great Britain introduced home abortions in the coronavirus pandemic, there have been cases of women taking abortion pills beyond the limit.

“There can be severe complications with abortion pills – particularly if taken later in pregnancy – including haemorrhaging and excruciating pain, which are exacerbated by lack of medical supervision.

“We ought to be deeply troubled by this push from ideologically-driven activists to allow even easier access to abortion, which will mean more unborn children being killed, and more women being exposed to the dangers of these pills.”

Home abortions are available for women in Scotland who are under 12 weeks pregnant, while the limit is 10 weeks for England and Wales. Northern Ireland does not allow DIY abortions at any gestation.

Earlier this year, official statistics reported a “sustained and substantial” increase in abortions in Scotland in the last ten years.

Public Health Scotland published its annual report on abortion, which showed another increase from the previous year with a record high of 18,710 unborn babies killed in 2024.

The report noted that the “most common method, accounting for 57% of all terminations, involved taking both drugs at home”.

Sadly, even that isn't enough death for these ghouls!

The newly appointed Archbishop pf Canterbury - supposedly the worldwide head of the Anglican Church, is not only a woman, but also a firm supporter of abortion.

Dame Sarah Mullally, 63, who has served as Bishop of London for the past seven years, succeeds Justin Welby, who resigned in 2024 following a scandal.

Mullally has publicly described her stance on abortion as favoring abortion - the systematic killing of babies before birth.

She claims to be personally opposed to abortion, but with other people killing babies. That is a hypocritical position for a Christian. Christians wouldn’t say they are personally opposed to rape or child abuse, but fine with other people engaging in such evil and illegal behaviors. Somehow she thinks killing babies in abortions is different, despite the logical failings of the position.

In interviews and public comments, Mullally has explicitly stated, “I would suspect that I would describe my approach to this issue as pro-choice rather than pro-life.”

During her tenure as Chief Nursing Officer for England (1999–2004), she advocated for NHS provision of abortion – where the British government was literally killing babies at taxpayer expense in hospitals and clinics.

Two respected members of the House of Lords are set to table amendments to overturn the ‘abortion up to birth’ clause in the Government’s Crime and Policing Bill and to reinstate in-person medical consultations before at-home abortions.

Baroness Monckton MBE believes that allowing women to have abortions at any stage of pregnancy without sanction will lead to more women conducting dangerous late-term abortions by themselves. This is because, while women will not face criminal charges, the same does not apply to doctors who assist in an abortion post-24, weeks unless the mother’s life is at risk or the baby is deemed to have a disability.

And while an amendment to reinstate in-person appointments was rejected by the House of Commons, Baroness Stroud is seeking to outlaw the ‘pills-by-post’ scheme that has been in place since the coronavirus pandemic.

The moves follow a debate in the House of Lords on the Crime and Policing Bill, which contains Antonia Antoniazzi’s Clause 191. This clause, which allows women to abort their babies up to birth, was passed by MPs in June, with 379 in favour and 137 against. Lady Monckton’s amendment would remove it.

The baroness said: “This is an extreme social change for which there is no public pressure or demand, and could have tragic consequences for women, as well as leading to increased numbers of abortions of viable babies.

“This radical clause was added to the Bill after less than an hour of debate by MPs, and without the necessary scrutiny required for an issue of such seriousness. Whatever one’s views on abortion, this is not how responsible laws are made”.

She added: “A large number of peers have indicated that they will support my amendment to remove Clause 191″.

Lady Monckton said she was supporting Baroness Stroud’s amendment on in-person appointments, which she said would ensure “gestation, health risks and any coercion risks can be properly assessed”.

Lady Stroud said: “Supporters of decriminalising abortion up to birth cite a small number of prosecutions of women for illegal late-term abortions in recent years.

“The increase in such cases is a direct result of the ‘pills by post’ scheme, whereby women can receive abortion pills without an in-person consultation to verify their gestational age is within the legal limit”.

She added: “The solution to such cases is not to make matters worse by removing the legal deterrent against women performing their own at-home abortions up to birth, which would likely endanger women further, but to reinstate in-person consultations”.

Lady Stroud continued: “I, and many others, warned of the dangers of the ‘pills by post’ scheme when it was introduced. Sadly, those warnings have come true.”

Canada has become a killing field. Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Executive Director Alex Schadenberg has revealed that Canada has euthanized 90,000 people since 2016.

Based on government data and calculated 2025 estimates, Schadenberg estimates that around 90,000 Canadians have been euthanised since the Liberal government legalised the deadly practice in 2016.

“There were around 16,500 Canadian euthanasia deaths in 2024 representing 5% of all deaths,” he declared. “There have been around 90,000 Canadian euthanasia deaths since legalization.”

Schadenberg bases his estimate on 2024 data from Ontario, Québec, Alberta, and British Columbia.

“Since Ontario, Québec, Alberta and BC represent 87% of Canada’s population, and since there were 1056 more euthanasia deaths in those provinces in 2024, and since there were 15,343 reported euthanasia deaths in 2023, therefore it is safe to predict that there were around 16,500 reported euthanasia deaths in 2024,” he explained.

Schadenberg noted a 7.5 percent increase in euthanasia deaths across Ontario, Québec, Alberta, and British Columbia from 2023 to 2024.

Furthermore, as of December 31, 2023, the Canadian government has counted 60,301 euthanasia deaths in Canada since legalization.

“I am predicting that there were approximately 16,500 reported euthanasia deaths in 2024,” Schadenberg explained. “Therefore, as of December 31, 2024 there were around 76,800 reported euthanasia deaths since legalization.”

“Since this article is published in late September, 2025, it is likely there have been around 90,000 Canadian euthanasia deaths since legalization,” he said.

Tragically, euthanasia, or so-called “medical assistance in dying” (MAID), has become increasingly popular among Canadians as wait times to receive health care in Canada have increased to an average of 27.7 weeks, leading some Canadians to despair and opt for death instead of waiting for assistance.