Have you seen our Protect Our Children Campaign?

 

New teaching materials created by the NHS, Scottish Government and Education Authorities advise that kids aged between five and nine-years-old should be taught about the ‘gender issue’!

It’s time to take a stand to defend our precious children from corruption.  A pro-life victory would also send a clear message to the would-be abusers of our children and mockers of our faith that their time is coming to an end.

We will not tolerate this kind of thing anymore! All this is possible if we can raise the campaign costs, are YOU with me?

Please use the donation form below!

Protect Our Children Campaign

Select an amount

News

How Abortion is Killing Canada

A shockling new video from pro-life group 4MyCanada has highlighted the devastating impact of abortion on the country since 1969

The video, released by 4MyCanada on its YouTube channel, is entitled “Just the Facts -Did Canada Commit Suicide by Abortion? Birth Rate Dips Below Extinction Rate.”

“Abortion was not good for Canada. It’s killing us,” says the narrator in the video, going on to add that the reality is, it is one of the “most uncomfortable issues in our national conversation.”

“Many Canadians hold deeply held pro-life convictions because of our faith. Others don’t. So rather than debating the procedure itself, the impacts on women and families, or the moral positions surrounding it, let’s simply look at the facts and the math.”

The video noted that since abortion became legal in Canada in 1969, “Canada has no nationwide criminal law restricting abortion at any stage of pregnancy.”

“We are the only Western nation with no laws on abortion. Based on Government of Canada statistics, an estimated 4.8 million abortions have taken place since legalization. However, statisticians widely acknowledge that these figures are incomplete.”

Abortion was decriminalized in Canada in 1969 when then-Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau (Justin Trudeau’s father) passed a heavily criticized omnibus bill that amended the Criminal Code to allow abortions to be done in hospitals under permissive circumstances.

This law remained in effect until the Supreme Court of Canada struck it down and labeled it unconstitutional in the 1988 Morgentaler decision. The law was removed on a technicality, with the court ruling that it violated a woman’s right to “security of the person” because it could not be applied equally across the country.

Since the 1990 Senate vote, Canada has had no abortion law at all, allowing the deadly practice through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason.

The video by 4MyCanada noted that, as abortion clinics are not “required to report their data,” as it is “voluntary,” the true number of deaths from the procedure is more. “National totals do not include abortions carried out using the abortion pill.”

“When we examine Canadian demographic trends over the past 5 1/2 decades, a clear picture emerges of the impact. Many of the children aborted in those early decades would now be parents and some even grandparents,” the narrator stated in the video.

Broken down, this means that when one considers “lost children and grandchildren” and using “conservative demographic modeling,” it’s estimated that more “than 6.13 million Canadians are missing from our population today because of abortion.”

“This figure is almost certainly understated,” the group noted.

The video observed that if these Canadians had been allowed to be born, they would have represented a minimum of “nine percent of today’s Canadian workforce, or approximately 2.1 million workers.”

“That workforce would include an estimated 840 surgeons, 3,800 lawyers, 5,000 pastors and ministers, more than 5,000 inventors and innovators, 6,300 doctors, 21,000 engineers, 24,000 law enforcement professionals, more than 31,000 agricultural workers, nearly 40,000 registered nurses, almost 59,000 teachers, and well over 200,000 skilled tradespeople, 231,000 entrepreneurs,” the video explained.

The video narrator for 4MyCanada noted that these numbers are not just “statistics” but represent people who “could have helped meet many of Canada’s growing labour shortages and populations’ health care and security needs.”

“For decades, governments have attempted to offset demographic decline through immigration. Immigration is valuable and has contributed greatly to Canada, but from a demographic standpoint, it cannot fully replace the population structure lost through abortion,” the video stated.

According to 4MyCanada, if 100,000 babies are not born in “a given year, replenishing that exact age group would require 100,000 babies to immigrate, not adults.”

“When families immigrate, they naturally arrive with parents and relatives of different ages, changing the demographic structure rather than replenishing it. The demographic which is lost no longer exists to undergird the aging population. The mathematics simply are not identical,” the group said.

When it comes to lost revenue in taxes, the group estimates that the total “federal tax revenue not collected because of the aborted Canadians totaled approximately $1.3 trillion at the end of 2024.”

“Ironically, Canada’s federal debt at March 31, 2024, stood at approximately $1.236 trillion,” the group highlighted in the video.

The video also raised concerns about Canada’s low birth rate. It has plunged to an all-time low for the second year in a row and shows no signs of improving anytime soon.

According to Statistics Canada’s latest births and still births data from 2024, the nation’s official fertility rate is 1.25 children per woman, lower than in 2023, which was 1.26 children per woman.

“What kind of financial burden are we leaving to our children and to our grandchildren? But the issue extends beyond economics. A healthy civilization requires a birth rate of approximately 2.1 children per woman simply to replace itself,” the video asked.

“Before abortion was legalized, Canada’s fertility rate was well above replacement. Within a few years after that, it had fallen below the replacement rate of 2.1. Apart from a modest recovery during the years when more family-supportive public policies were in place, the long-term trend has continued downward. In 2019, the abortion pill became publicly funded across every province and territory, expanding access nationwide.”

After being legalized in 2016 by the government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, euthanasia in Canada has become rampant and commonplace.

Likewise, current Prime Minister Mark Carney has worked to expand euthanasia 13-fold since it was legalized in 2016. Canada now has the fastest-growing assisted suicide program in the world. Meanwhile, Health Canada has released a series of studies on advanced requests for assisted suicide.

New Zealand Sees 50% Surge in Euthanasia Deaths

In New Zealand, cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide have increased by almost 50% (48.17%) for the year April 2025 to March 2026 compared with the same period in 2022-2023, just three years ago, according to data released by the New Zealand Ministry of Health.

According to ‘Registrar (assisted dying) Annual Report to the Minister of Health – June 2026′, there were a total of 486 cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide in New Zealand from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, a 48.17% increase from the same period in 2022-2023, the first full year in which euthanasia and assisted suicide were available, when there were 328 cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide in the country.

In the year 2025/26, the 486 cases of euthanasia and assisted suicides accounted for 1.29% of all deaths in New Zealand. 

7% of applicants reported having a disability, and one in five applicants were not receiving palliative care at the time of application.

Only 16 applicants had a psychiatric assessment to check for competence to make an informed decision about assisted suicide.

Fewer than 1 in 10 applicants (8.33%) had a neurological condition, a relatively small proportion, despite the need for people with neurological conditions to access assisted suicide or euthanasia regularly being referred to by campaigners as a key reason for introducing assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Since euthanasia and assisted suicide were made legal in New Zealand in November 2021, 1,696 have ended their lives through these means.

The report also reveals a decline in the number of doctors willing to be involved in assisted suicide and euthanasia. The number of practitioners on the Support and Consultation for End of Life Choice (SCENZ) Group list, which connects patients with doctors willing to assess or carry out assisted deaths, fell from 148 in March 2023 to 121 in March 2025.

While doctors can provide assisted suicide or euthanasia to their own patients, those treating individuals outside their care must be on this list. The shrinking numbers have led to reports of doctors travelling long distances to assess patients, raising concerns about discomfort with helping a patient end their own life among healthcare professionals.  

The data also reveals a clear ethnic disparity in those accessing assisted suicide and euthanasia. New Zealand European/Pākehā applicants accounted for 81.1% of applications, while they represent 67.8% of the population. In contrast, Māori applicants made up only 4.9% of applications, despite representing 17.8% of the population; Asian applicants made up 2.49% of applications, despite representing 17.30% of the population; and applications from Pacific peoples made up 0.77% of applications, despite representing 8.90% of the population.

Of the 486 people who died, 94.65% (460) died by euthanasia, where a doctor or nurse ended a patient’s life either through ingestion (1) or through injection (459). 26 people (5.35%) ended their lives through assisted suicide. The key legal distinction between the two is who carries out the act: in euthanasia, it is a third party who ends the person’s life, while in assisted suicide, the person ends their own life.

Under the current law in New Zealand, a person can end their life by assisted suicide or euthanasia if they are thought to have six months left to live.

However, there have been attempts to expand the law beyond the current six-month prognosis limit. Last year, ACT Party MP Todd Stephenson tabled a Members Bill to remove this.

ACT Party leader David Seymour MP also called for the six-month requirement to be scrapped in 2022, only a year after the law came into effect in 2021. Astonishingly, this is from the same David Seymour who, before the Bill to introduce assisted suicide and euthanasia became law in New Zealand, told the NZ Parliament that opponents’ claims that the law would be expanded in the future were a “slippery slope fallacy”.