Support for the Assisted Suicide Bill is "ebbing away" in Westminster.

The special horror of late-term abortion is back in the spotlight.

London's liberal-Muslim Mayor is pushing the Government to complete the decriminalisation of the possession of cannabis.

Sadiq Khan, a long-time activist for liberalising the law, claimed the London Drugs Commission’s (LDC) new report “makes a compelling, evidence-based case for the decriminalisation of possession of small quantities of natural cannabis which the Government should consider”.

The LDC, which Khan established, claimed the Class B drug should be moved from the Misuse of Drugs Act to the Psychoactive Substances Act. The LDC branded the 14-year maximum prison sentence for possessing enough cannabis to supply to others “extreme, relative to the dangers of cannabis itself”.

But a Home Office spokesperson emphasised that the Government “has no intention of reclassifying cannabis from a Class B substance”.

“We will continue to work with partners across health, policing and wider public services to drive down drug use, ensure more people receive timely treatment and support, and make our streets and communities safer.”

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp warned: “Possession of cannabis should not be decriminalised like this. We have seen some US and Canadian cities devastated by soft policies on addictive and harmful drugs – now Sadiq Khan wants to send London the same way.

“Cannabis is illegal for a reason. Cannabis is associated with anti-social behaviour and heavy use can lead to serious psychosis and severe mental health problems. US and Canadian cities which tried this approach have ended up as crime-ridden ghettos with stupefied addicts on the streets and law-abiding citizens frightened to go there”.

Previous research has linked cannabis use to the development of bipolar disorder in later life.

A study published by the medical journal Schizophrenia Bulletin in 2017 found a prospective link between teenage cannabis use and the onset of hypomania – often a symptom of bipolar disorder – in a person’s early 20s. It found that those who used cannabis at least two-to-three times a week aged 17 were more likely to experience these symptoms than those who did not.

Several MPs have tabled a new amendment to Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill to prevent adults under the age of 25 from secretly ending their lives under the Bill.

As the assisted suicide Bill returns to Parliament tomorrow, Labour MP Juliet Campbell has tabled an amendment that would require the next of kin to be informed if an adult under the age of 25 has their application for an assisted death approved. Campbell’s amendment states “where the person to whom the referral relates is under the age of 25”, there is an obligation to inform the person’s “next of kin”. 

With no requirement in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill to inform or involve family, there is nothing in the Bill to prevent assisted suicides taking place in secret in England should it become law. 

Conservative MP Rebecca Paul, who is supporting the amendment, registered her concerns around the lack of reference to families in the Bill, saying “The current bill prioritises patient autonomy over everything else, and this can be seen in the absence of references to family and next of kin throughout the Bill”.

“Right now, the first a family may know about the assisted death of their loved one is when they get the call to collect the body. There will be mothers and fathers out there that will get this call about their child if this Bill goes through without improvements to the process and safeguards”.

She said the amendment “will at least help protect young people, especially those with learning disabilities, by ensuring their families are aware before the drugs are administered”.

The issue of family involvement was raised during the Bill’s Committee Stage discussions, when Danny Kruger MP tabled an amendment that would have required that the person seeking an assisted suicide sign a declaration saying they have or have not informed their family of their decision. It was not selected.

During the discussions, Rebecca Paul said “My point is that the family should be listened to and should have a route to legally provide information to the panel. Right now, they have no right to do that”.

A picture says a thousand words, doesn’t it? The product description, meanwhile, gives you the full story.

“Unleash your inner fire this Pride Month,” the seller says, “with our stunning Rainbow Devil t-shirt!”

That tells you everything you need to know about what the LGBT Pride flag really stands for, but wait, there’s more!

“This unique and edgy design features a powerful demonic figure adorned with vibrant rainbow horns and wings, set against a celestial background. It’s a bold statement piece for anyone who celebrates Pride with a touch of defiance and alternative flair.” (emphasis added)

It’s a “bold statement” indeed, uttered from the pits of hell.

Ee’re seeing the LGBT Pride movement openly embrace the devil.

The true nature of this “Pride” revolution is coming out into the open, isn’t it? It is, of course, closely related to the same people's enthusiasm for abortion. You see, God created Mankind; He created us all male and female, and babies are His creation too. To change and twist human sexuality, to mutilate adolescents and to butcher unborn babies is thus all an attack on God, and a sacrifice to Satan. And his human imps know it!

Unborn babies in England and Wales face the gravest danger since abotion was legalised back in 1967. An Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi (pictured) has tabled an amendment to a Government Bill that would change the law so it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason, and at any point up to and during birth.

The amendment (NC1), tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill, would likely lead to a significant increase in the number of women performing late-term abortions at home, endangering the lives of many more women. 

The proposed change to the law would also lead to an increased number of viable babies’ lives being ended well beyond the 24-week abortion time limit and beyond the point at which they would be able to survive outside the womb.

Antoniazzi’s amendment does not outline circumstances in which it would continue to be an offence for a woman to perform her own abortion – the changes to the law would apply throughout all nine months of pregnancy and would not exclude sex-selective abortions. 

By amending the abortion law in this way, self-abortions will, de facto, become possible up to birth for any reason including abortions for sex-selective purposes, as women could mislead abortion providers about their gestational age (as in the case of Carla Foster, who pretended to be 7 weeks pregnant but took pills at 32-34 weeks gestation).

Sex-selective abortion usually targets baby girls due to a preference among certain parents and some cultures for having sons.

The Government maintains that, under our current legislation, abortion on the grounds of the sex of the baby is illegal because it is “not one of the lawful grounds for termination of pregnancy” set out in the Abortion Act (which stipulates that abortion can only be performed under specific grounds). 

However, since the amendment does not outline circumstances in which it would continue to be an offence for a woman to perform her own abortion, the changes to the law would not exclude sex-selective abortions.

Polling undertaken by ComRes, which has undertaken polls for the BBC, ITV, The Independent and Sky News, shows that only 1% of women support introducing abortion up to birth and 70% of women would support a reduction in the time limit from 24 weeks to 20 weeks or below. 91% of women also oppose sex-selective abortion.

The same polling showed 60% of both Conservative and Labour voters supported a reduction in the time limit to 20 weeks or below. 65% of Liberal Democrat voters were in favour of a reduction in the abortion time limit to 20 weeks or below. Significantly, among those with children aged 18 or under in their household, 69% supported reducing the abortion limit to 20 weeks gestation or below.

The polling also showed that 89% of the general population oppose sex-selective abortion. 

Polling published by the Daily Telegraph shows that more than half of the general public agree that it should remain the case that a woman is breaking the law if she has an abortion of a healthy baby after the current 24-week legal time limit up until birth. Only 16% disagreed.

A separate poll from Ipsos released in August 2023 shows that only 36% of the British population think abortion should be legal during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. This is a significant decrease in support for abortion up to 20 weeks from the previous year, conducted by the same polling organisation, where 40% of people in Great Britain thought abortion should be legal in the first 20 weeks

The Assisted Suicide vote in Scotland is on a knife-edge. Liam McArthur’s assisted suicide Bill is in doubt, after the Bill passed Stage One by only 14 votes. This means only seven MSPs need to change their vote for the Bill to fall at the final (Stage Three) vote, likely later this year.

The Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill was widely predicted to comfortably pass Stage One, so the result will come as a major shock to assisted suicide campaigners supportive of the Bill.

Ahead of and during the debate, several MSPs made it clear that they were only voting in favour at Stage One to continue the debate around the Bill, and would only vote for the Bill at Stage Three on condition that there are significant improvements to the Bill before it comes back for its final vote in the Scottish Parliament.

This means that the McArthur assisted suicide Bill could well have insufficient numbers to pass the final Stage Three vote.

Last year, the Leadbeater Bill in Westminster passed by 55 votes, a much larger margin, proportionally, than on the McArthur Bill this evening, but following Committee Stage scrutiny, there are growing doubts that it will pass the final vote in the Commons, even after its margin of 55 at the first vote at Westminster.

A large number of MSPs from across the political spectrum came together to give powerful speeches against the Bill during the debate today. They made it clear that this dangerous and extreme change to Scottish law would put the vulnerable at risk and see the ending of many lives through assisted suicide.

If you live in Scotland, contact your MSP today and urge them to do the right thing! For Life!

One of the world's biggest and most important studies of Covid jab safety and impacts has been defunded and scrapped. All samples and data are being destroyed in what jab-sceptics see as a blatant cover up.

Trans madness has gripped Jersey.

Parents in the Channel Island have expressed outrage after a Government department decided they do not need to be informed if their child starts ‘changing gender’ at school.

The Children, Young People, Education and Skills Department’s ‘Trans Inclusion Guidance’ advises teachers that a child “being LGBTQ+ or exploring their gender identity does not in itself constitute a safeguarding concern, nor is it something the child’s parents or carers must be informed of”.

It goes on to suggest that when communicating with parents, schools may sometimes need to use the name and pronouns the parent uses for the child, hiding from them that a different name and pronouns are used in school.

The guidance also instructs schools: “Ensure that the pupil knows what toilet/changing room facility that corresponds with their gender identity is available to use.”