News

  • Anorexics Endangered by Assisted Suicide Bill

    A woman in recovery from anorexia has shared her fears about the dangers the assisted suicide Bill could cause for people living with eating disorders.

    Speaking with Chelsea Roff, the founder of leading eating disorder charity Eat Breathe Thrive,   Ailidh Musgrave said “My concerns lie with people like myself who are still in the throes of anorexia right now, what the assisted dying Bill could mean for them and their families”.

    The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would legalise assisted suicide in England and Wales for those with a prognosis of six months or less. People with anorexia could be eligible for assisted suicide after the House of Commons assisted suicide Bill Committee chose not to close a loophole in the Bill, according to eating disorder charities. The Bill is currently going through Committee Stage scrutiny in the House of Lords.

    Having been diagnosed with anorexia at the age of 13, Musgrave spent years going in and out of hospitals, at times being given less than a week to live. Refusing to be fed and hydrated, Musgrave only survived because her mother encouraged her to eat. She said “I didn’t see a future […] there was no future. There was absolutely no way out”.

    Now in recovery, Musgrave, 28, shared her concerns about the implications of the assisted suicide Bill for people with eating disorders, saying “What I don’t want is that people like myself who are young, who have so much ahead of them if they are able to get treatment, to fall through a crack”.

    ‘I would not be standing here today if the Bill had been law when I was ill’

    Musgrave said she would have previously chosen assisted suicide if it were legal, telling Parliament earlier this year “There is no doubt in my mind that I would not be standing here today if the [assisted suicide] Bill had been law when I was ill”.

    Musgrave now hopes to go to university to study policing, saying “I want people to know that there is an end to the pain that we live through. If I had ended my life, I would not know that actually, recovery’s possible”.

    Musgrave’s comments came as an open letter, whose signatories include actress Sophie Turner and Gail Porter, warned that the Bill “could make individuals with eating disorders eligible for assisted death at times when they are unable to access or accept treatment”.

    The letter, coordinated by Eat Breathe Thrive, warned that the Bill’s definition of “terminally ill” could be interpreted to include people with eating disorders who develop severe complications from starvation, vomiting or, in those cases in which someone has Type 1 diabetes, insulin restriction.

    “In a health system already stretched beyond capacity, someone who is severely ill and ambivalent about treatment could be assessed as eligible for assisted death”, the letter says.

    Threat of the Bill towards people with eating disorders

    Chelsea Roff previously published a study that identified “at least 60 patients with EDs who underwent assisted dying between 2012 and 2024” in countries with assisted suicide and/or euthanasia.

    The letter states they “were not individuals who were inevitably dying, but individuals whose illnesses had become life-threatening in the absence of effective treatment”. 

    Concerns that the Bill poses a threat to people with eating disorders have been shared throughout the Bill’s parliamentary journey. At Third Reading in the House of Commons, Naz Shah MP pointed to Roff’s evidence where at least 60 women with anorexia died by assisted suicide, not because they were terminally ill, but because they weren’t given proper treatment. She warned that the amended Bill still does not “close the [anorexia] loophole”.  

    Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “It is clear that the lives of people with eating disorders would be under threat if the dangerous assisted suicide Bill were to become law”.

    “Vulnerable people deserve our care and support, no matter what condition they may be suffering from. What they do not need is help and encouragement to end their lives”.

    Dear reader,

    You may be surprised to learn that our 24-week abortion time limit is out of line with the majority of European Union countries, where the most common time limit for abortion on demand or on broad social grounds is 12 weeks gestation.

    The latest guidance from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine enables doctors to intervene to save premature babies from 22 weeks. The latest research indicates that a significant number of babies born at 22 weeks gestation can survive outside the womb, and this number increases with proactive perinatal care.

    This leaves a real contradiction in British law. In one room of a hospital, doctors could be working to save a baby born alive at 23 weeks whilst, in another room of that same hospital, a doctor could perform an abortion that would end the life of a baby at the same age.

    The majority of the British population support reducing the time limit. Polling has shown that 70% of British women favour a reduction in the time limit from 24 weeks to 20 weeks or below.

    Please click the button below to sign the petition to the Prime Minister, asking him to do everything in his power to reduce the abortion time limit.

    A woman in recovery from anorexia has shared her fears about the dangers the assisted suicide Bill could cause for people living with eating disorders.

    Speaking with Chelsea Roff, the founder of leading eating disorder charity Eat Breathe Thrive,   Ailidh Musgrave said “My concerns lie with people like myself who are still in the throes of anorexia right now, what the assisted dying Bill could mean for them and their families”.

    The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would legalise assisted suicide in England and Wales for those with a prognosis of six months or less. People with anorexia could be eligible for assisted suicide after the House of Commons assisted suicide Bill Committee chose not to close a loophole in the Bill, according to eating disorder charities. The Bill is currently going through Committee Stage scrutiny in the House of Lords.

    Having been diagnosed with anorexia at the age of 13, Musgrave spent years going in and out of hospitals, at times being given less than a week to live. Refusing to be fed and hydrated, Musgrave only survived because her mother encouraged her to eat. She said “I didn’t see a future […] there was no future. There was absolutely no way out”.

    Now in recovery, Musgrave, 28, shared her concerns about the implications of the assisted suicide Bill for people with eating disorders, saying “What I don’t want is that people like myself who are young, who have so much ahead of them if they are able to get treatment, to fall through a crack”.

    Musgrave said she would have previously chosen assisted suicide if it were legal, telling Parliament earlier this year “There is no doubt in my mind that I would not be standing here today if the [assisted suicide] Bill had been law when I was ill”.

    Musgrave now hopes to go to university to study policing, saying “I want people to know that there is an end to the pain that we live through. If I had ended my life, I would not know that actually, recovery’s possible”.

    Musgrave’s comments came as an open letter, whose signatories include actress Sophie Turner and Gail Porter, warned that the Bill “could make individuals with eating disorders eligible for assisted death at times when they are unable to access or accept treatment”.

    The letter, coordinated by Eat Breathe Thrive, warned that the Bill’s definition of “terminally ill” could be interpreted to include people with eating disorders who develop severe complications from starvation, vomiting or, in those cases in which someone has Type 1 diabetes, insulin restriction.

    “In a health system already stretched beyond capacity, someone who is severely ill and ambivalent about treatment could be assessed as eligible for assisted death”, the letter says.

    Threat of the Bill towards people with eating disorders

    Chelsea Roff previously published a study that identified “at least 60 patients with EDs who underwent assisted dying between 2012 and 2024” in countries with assisted suicide and/or euthanasia.

    The letter states they “were not individuals who were inevitably dying, but individuals whose illnesses had become life-threatening in the absence of effective treatment”. 

    Concerns that the Bill poses a threat to people with eating disorders have been shared throughout the Bill’s parliamentary journey. At Third Reading in the House of Commons, Naz Shah MP pointed to Roff’s evidence where at least 60 women with anorexia died by assisted suicide, not because they were terminally ill, but because they weren’t given proper treatment. She warned that the amended Bill still does not “close the [anorexia] loophole”.  

    Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “It is clear that the lives of people with eating disorders would be under threat if the dangerous assisted suicide Bill were to become law”.

    “Vulnerable people deserve our care and support, no matter what condition they may be suffering from. What they do not need is help and encouragement to end their lives”.

    Dear reader,

    You may be surprised to learn that our 24-week abortion time limit is out of line with the majority of European Union countries, where the most common time limit for abortion on demand or on broad social grounds is 12 weeks gestation.

    The latest guidance from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine enables doctors to intervene to save premature babies from 22 weeks. The latest research indicates that a significant number of babies born at 22 weeks gestation can survive outside the womb, and this number increases with proactive perinatal care.

    This leaves a real contradiction in British law. In one room of a hospital, doctors could be working to save a baby born alive at 23 weeks whilst, in another room of that same hospital, a doctor could perform an abortion that would end the life of a baby at the same age.

    The majority of the British population support reducing the time limit. Polling has shown that 70% of British women favour a reduction in the time limit from 24 weeks to 20 weeks or below.

    Please click the button below to sign the petition to the Prime Minister, asking him to do everything in his power to reduce the abortion time limit.

    Rght To Life UK

     

  • Drug Gangs Target British Teens

    Drug gangs are targetting British teenagers on a shocking scale. The criminals are believed to have recruited well over 100,000 under-18s in the past year, with hundreds of thousands more approached, a new survey has revealed.

    According to the Youth Endowment Fund (YEF), twelve per cent of 13 to 17-year-olds reported being approached by criminals to either: “sell drugs; transport drugs; or store drugs, weapons or money”.

    The Government-funded charity asked nearly 11,000 teenage children England and Wales to share their experience of exploitation and gangs.

    YEF found that eight per cent of respondents were asked to sell drugs, 7.1 per cent were asked to transport them, and 5.7 per cent were asked to store drugs, weapons or money.

    It said: “Around a quarter of those who were approached to do one of these things went through with it — the equivalent of 120,000 13-17-year-olds in England and Wales.”

    The survey revealed that the most common tactic used “to exploit teens into crime” was bribery with, criminals offering money, ‘goods’, drugs or alcohol. Gangs also used threats of violence and blackmail.

    YEF Chief Executive Jon Yates said it is “horrifying how many children are being targeted” by drug gangs and called for “timely support” to help them “break free from this cycle of harm and violence”.

  • UK Hindus in Sex-Selective Abortion Slaughter

    Analysis by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has found a “statistically significant imbalance” in the ratio of boys and girls born to Indian parents in Britain, which its researchers believe points to a culture of sex-selective abortions.

    Preferred sex is not an acceptable ground for abortion under the law but MPs voted against an explicit ban when passing the Crime and Policing Bill, which is currently progressing through the House of Lords.

    If the report’s conclusions are correct, it estimates that approximately 400 baby girls may have been sex-selectively aborted “over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021”.

    “Sex is not a lawful ground for termination of pregnancy… Anyone with evidence that this illegal practice is occurring must report it to the police immediately”

    A spokesman from the DHSC stated: “This Government’s position is unequivocal: sex-selective abortion is illegal in England and Wales and will not be tolerated.

    “Sex is not a lawful ground for termination of pregnancy, and it is a criminal offence for any practitioner to carry out an abortion for that reason alone.”

    He explained: “Anyone with evidence that this illegal practice is occurring must report it to the police immediately. We continue to work closely with providers to ensure that abortions are only performed in accordance with the strict legal grounds set out in the Abortion Act.”

    Baroness Eaton, who is seeking to amend the Crime and Policing Bill to explicitly outlaw sex-selective abortion, said: “The Government’s own data suggests that there are hundreds of missing baby girls as a result of sex-selective abortion taking place right here in the UK”.

    She warned that this “disturbing problem could get much worse if the abortion clause in the Crime and Policing Bill becomes law”, explaining that the amendment to decriminalise women who have abortions at any stage of pregnancy could increase the possibility of women performing their own sex-selective abortions at home.

  • Jesus, Lord at Thy Birth

    We wish all our campaigners and supporters a Merry and Blessed Christmas, and a Happy and Peaceful New Year.

  • Christmas Church Attendance Rises Sharply

    Research commissioned by Tearfund asked 2,017 UK adults if they are planning to attend a church event this Christmas.

    It found that 45 per cent of UK adults are “planning to attend a church event or service this year”, a growth from 40 per cent the previous year.

    The poll also found that: “Among non Christians, more than a third (34%) say they plan to attend a church service or event this year, up from 30% last year.”

    Looking at age groups, it identified that “Gen Z are the largest generation to say they plan to attend church this Christmas”.

    When asked about church community outreach, the poll found that 48 per cent of respondents “think the Church is effective at addressing major social challenges” rising to 54 per cent amongst 18-34 year olds.

     

  • Ireland Saved From Abortion Til Birth

    Ireland has been saved - at least for now - from the special horror of abortion up until birth. A proposal to revisit radical plans for the decriminalisation of abortion up to birth has been narrowly rejected by Deputies.

    TDs voted by 73 to 71 against restoring the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) (Amendment) Bill 2023 for further debate in the Dáil.

    The controversial Private Member’s Bill, which lapsed after the dissolution of the Dáil last year, called for full decriminalisation of abortion up to birth for any reason and the dismantling of the three-day reflection period before having an abortion.

    Eilís Mulroy of the Pro Life Campaign welcomed the outcome and expressed encouragement at the many TDs “taking stock of the dramatic increase in abortions since the law changed and of the disturbing realities now emerging under the current legislation”.

    She added: “As a society, we should be prioritising alternatives to abortion and meaningful support for women, not policies that drive abortion numbers higher.”

    One in six babies in Ireland were killed by abortion in 2024, according to the Department of Health.

  • Brave Isabel Charged Under New Law

    Isabel Vaughan-Spruce has twice been arrested for silently praying outside an abortion clinic in Birmingham, and she's twice been freed and vindicated. Indeed, West Midlands Police subsequently apologised and gave her a £13,000 payout. But, thanks to the new buffer zone law, West Midlands Police have decided to charge her for a third time.

    Abortion buffer zones came into force in October 2024 outside abortion clinics in England and Wales, criminalising offering vital support to women, and amid confusion about precisely what activities are prohibited outside abortion clinics.

    While Vaughan-Spruce has been arrested on previous occasions, she has never been charged with a crime. Individuals are arrested if they are suspected of committing a crime, allowing police to question them and gather evidence. After being arrested, individuals can be either released or charged with committing a crime. Despite Vaughan-Spruce not having been charged on previous occasions, following several months of consideration by prosecutors, she has now been charged. 

    Speaking when first arrested, Isabel explained her position: “Despite being fully vindicated multiple times after being wrongfully arrested for my thoughts, it’s unbelievable that two and a half years later, I am still being harassed by police for silently praying in that area, and yet again find myself under investigation for the same prayers I have said for twenty years”.

    “Silent prayer cannot possibly be a crime – everyone has the right to freedom of thought”.

    Vaughan-Spruce is due to appear at Birmingham magistrates’ court on 29 January and, if she is found guilty, could face an unlimited fine.

  • Assisted Suicide for Pregnant Women

    "Pregnancy should not be a bar” to assisted suicide, according to the Labour peer pushing state-sanctioned murder through the House of Lords

    Lord Charles Leslie Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton, made this shocking statement as the Assisted Dying bill was debated in the Upper Chamber. Falconer served as Secretary of State for Justice under Prime Minister Tony Blair and is both a longtime advocate of assisted suicide and the bill’s sponsor in the Lords.

    “There is a big issue here,” Lord Craig Mackinlay, Baron Mackinlay of Richborough, told the peers. “In other states around the world who have had assisted dying for some time have differences of view. In Oregon, since 1997, there is a requirement to keep the mother alive as long as possible, particularly when there is a viable fetus.”

    “The Netherlands takes a completely different view, and that is one of feticide, where the fetus has to be terminated by one means or another,” he continued. “Often by intracardiac injection of potassium chloride before the mother can be euthanized.”

    “On which end of the scale does [the noble lord] refer these things, because we are in a situation where the Royal Colleges are against his whole system, and we will be relying on them to fill in the gaps of this legislation,” Lord Mackinlay concluded. “I think it is incumbent on us to fill in those gaps for them, because they’re not keen on this.”

    “The noble lord puts it accurately,” Lord Falconer responded. “Some countries have taken one view, and other countries have taken another. It’s clear from the choice that I am supporting that we take the view that pregnancy should not be a bar to it.”

  • Supreme Court Rules Against Christianity in NI Schools

    It's a dark day. In the week before Christmas, the UK Supreme Court has ruled that Christian education in Northern Ireland is unlawful, citing its “proselytising” nature and its lack of a “pluralistic” approach.

    The case, brought before the court by an unnamed father and daughter, challenged a public school’s religious education and prayer practices, arguing that they amounted to “indoctrination” and could stigmatise students who chose not to participate.

    “The word ‘indoctrination’ ordinarily has negative connotations but in the context of the Christian faith it is a synonym for evangelism or proselytising,” stated the Court.

    “It means winning others over so that they believe in and practice the Christian faith…To teach pupils to accept a set of beliefs without critical analysis amounts to evangelism, proselytising, and indoctrination.”

    The court ruled in favour of the father and daughter, who, according to court documents, do not oppose the teaching of religion in schools so long as it “does not amount to indoctrination.”

    “The State is forbidden to pursue an aim of indoctrination that might be considered as not respecting parents’ religious and philosophical convictions.”

    In response, Bishop Alan McGuckian, SJ, of the Down and Connor Diocese, questioned if Catholic schools could be next in the suppression of “indoctrination.”

    “Many people have asked me; while it is explicitly noted in the judgement that this ruling applies to a controlled grant-aided primary school and does not apply to Catholic schools, what difference is this Supreme Court ruling going to make to the provision of Religious Education across [Northern Ireland] schools more widely?” asked McGuckian.

  • Another Abortion Buffer Zone Prosecution

    The left's Long War on Christianity and the Unborn grinds on in Northern Ireland. A retired Christian pastor faces trial in Coleraine Magistrate’s Court this week accused of breaching the province's controversial abortion buffer zone laws by preaching on John 3:16.

    Clive Johnston, former President of the Association of Baptist Churches in Ireland, faces two charges under the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act for holding an open-air service on the fringes of a buffer zone opposite Coleraine’s Causeway Hospital last year.

    Mr Johnston is expected to be a witness at the 17 December proceedings. If convicted, the grandfather of seven – who has never been in trouble with the police – faces a criminal record and potential fines totalling thousands of pounds.

    In March, Mr Johnston, who is being supported by The Christian Institute, pleaded not guilty to charges of seeking to ‘influence’ people accessing the hospital’s abortion services and for not immediately leaving the area when asked to do so by police.

    He was preaching from John 3:16, one of the most famous ‘good news’ verses in the Bible. The issue of abortion was never mentioned.