That the World Economic Forum and its peer groups have the whiff of sulfur about them is to be unkind to Hell. Yet the human cause is best served by accuracy in describing the deeds of these technocratic fantasists, to whom we are all little more than a management problem to be solved. 

Such a bold claim, if made without evidence, can be dismissed without argument. Yet the 30-year research of Professoro, himself no stranger to state-level gatherings, presents a body of work which reveals that “The Environmental Policies of the UN, the Club of Rome and the World Economic Forum are Esoteric Nonsense.”

The following arguments were first presented to a Finnish audience in October 2022, in a presentation simply titled “Occult Power.” They are made not by an obscure conspiracy theorist, but by a man whose long career has taken him into the very corridors of power:

The justifications of the UN and the World Economic Forum’s anti-enlightenment global policies, aimed at subjugating people, are dressed in the form of science, even though they are based on esotericism and the occult and are therefore only the irrational thinking of fools.

Professor Paunio is an epidemiologist who has worked for a number of public health institutions in his native Finland, as well as a brief spell at the World Bank, and is currently Senior Medical Officer in the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland. His work as a scientific and policy adviser has seen him involved in state level meetings across Europe and the United States.  

He has combined this with a forthright opposition to the crazy climate cult whose “Neo-Malthusian ideas” are a point of principle among the technocratic elite. In fact, it was his work as a specialist in public health which first alerted him to the dark undercurrents of these nature-worshipping misanthropes.

When I was a young medical researcher, I became one of the secretaries of the Prime Minister’s Energy Committee in the aftermath of the Chernobyl accident in Finland. I myself and the other secretaries had to read an endless handwritten stream-of-consciousness from a committee member called Pentti Malaska, professor of future studies at Turku University of Economics and Business.

What was so remarkable about this meeting? He was later revealed to have been an occultist.

Professor Paunio’s interest was piqued, and so began his long journey into what he terms “…the new-old nature pantheism that was born in the UN framework, with its partners the Club of Rome and the World Economic Forum.”

The Club of Rome was founded in 1968 in the year of its seminal publication, The Limits to Growth. It is composed of a hundred state-level leaders and technocrats drawn from government, business, and supra-national bureaucracies such as the UN.

This book was a milestone in modern earth worship, framing humanity as a handicap borne by a suffering planet. It presented a future of catastrophic collapse – in systems and human population – without the intervention of a benevolent and enlightened international organization. 

In combining prophecies of doom with the promise of hope it plowed a furrow well worn by the leaders of the international bureaucracies today. The World Health Organization, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum are all exponents of this method, and are of course united in their commitment to projects such as Net Zero. 

Yet there is more than a common interest in the marketing of crisis which unites these organizations, as Paunio explains. 

Back in 1991, in my first book, Vihreä valhe [The Green Lie], I made the observation that a large part of the activists of the neo-Malthusian Green anti science movement were attracted to anthroposophy or the more original occult thought, i.e., theosophy.

Paunio’s view is one that charges that the would-be world masters are fantasists, and their fantasies are directly inspired by an occult tradition going back to the 19th century. He claims they belong not merely to a cult, but argues the promotion and practice of such beliefs, whether hidden or not, amount to a creed which has supplanted that of the Church.

This religion has largely replaced Christianity in Western countries. Nature pantheism specifically draws from the ‘wisdom’ of theosophy, which is based on the esotericism and occultism of the world’s most famous con artist, Madame Blavatsky, who claimed to have discovered the ‘lost truth’ that unites world religions.

Paunio is careful to distinguish between “esoteric” – meaning “personal” – and “occult” – meaning “hidden.” His contention is that a cult of personal fantasy, whose private practices are reflected in a world view detached from reality, is endemic in the ruling elite. If this is indeed the case, it would help to explain why so many of our leaders seem concerned only with themselves, and why their beliefs and policies often seem to have little connection with observable reality. 

How much evidence is there of such a cult? Some of its most prominent followers do not much care to keep their occult beliefs to themselves. In January 2016 Klaus Schwab “…appeared in a television interview with RTS Suisse in Switzerland, where he openly revealed his crazy esoteric occultism.”

In the video mentioned, Schwab talks about the “fusion of the digital, physical and biological worlds” through a technology which Paunio says is nothing more than science fiction. 

Everything that Schwab mentioned on Swiss TV in 2016 is simply unethical science fiction. No such technology exists, nor will it ever exist. It’s just a cranky old man’s cranky thinking based on inner-space flights and ideas derived from occult rituals.

Paunio contends that the so-called science presented by people like Schwab is simply a fantasy. What then of Schwab’s protégé, Yuval Noah Harari? 

The WEF deliberately created a fake natural science CV for Yuval Harari, who is actually an historian.

Harari is simply a fraud, made up by his master to resemble a scientific prophet of the future. He is nothing more than another Walter Mitty, claims Paunio – but one nonetheless directed by a man with a certain commitment to occult traditions. 

Klaus Schwab recruited the by far ever most influential unelected UN environment official, Maurice Strong, a wealthy, un-educated Canadian industrialist (1929–2015), to head the WEF foundation. Maurice Strong was THE central figure in pushing forward the sustainable development agenda since the UN’s first environmental summit in Stockholm in 1972. He was also an inveterate occultist and esotericist.

Paunio has written at length on the development of the occult tradition from the 19th century, noting and naming figures in politics who have visibly absorbed the tenets of the new-old nature pantheism.  

How have these cranks achieved such a powerful platform? 

Thanks to the unconditional support given to them by the mainstream media, WEF’s insane global policies that are meant to impoverish us and aggravate environmental problems, have gained ground in all Western institutions, including protestant churches and the Catholic Church.

There can be no argument here, as the evidence is all around us. We already inhabit the digital monuments of a cult which has captured our leaders and our media. Yet the findings of Paunio go further than the international religion of doom. His work reveals how organizations. such as the WEF are working with governments to falsify evidence in order to promote an agenda – of collapse. 

Paunio proved in this article that the World Economic Forum used a Finnish innovation fund to advance Schwab’s Great Reset.

In 2016, SITRA, which is subordinate to the Finnish Parliament, delivered a fabricated report on Finland’s circular economy miracle and created the current circular economy concept for the World Economic Forum, which is harmful to the environment, to human health and the economy.

By exploiting this concept, the European Union Commission made presentations to the EU legislators, e.g., the green finance taxonomy regulation, Jyrki Katainen’s circular economy package and the massive Fit for 55 climate package, which is still mainly in the hands of EU legislators, and which ultimately will lead to Soviet-style five-year planning and the downfall of modern industrial society.

Professor Paunio’s work is not simply dedicated to laughing at buffoons and debunking their false credentials. It is a serious attempt to contribute to the counternarrative of a technocratic managerialism whose evil is rendered more comprehensible by the revelation of its occult inspirations. 

He ends his extensive essay on the subject with a rallying cry to the reality-based community.

We the people, ordinary workers and entrepreneurs who love their country and family, must wake up to defend enlightenment, freedom and modern society. Only the pursuit of the good, starting from one’s own starting points, can displace these human experiments conducted from abroad. Finland, as a society in its own right and as historically dominated by other nations, is now a solid platform for some kind of crazy experiments, unless our decision makers are aware of the enormous dangers associated with them.

Pro-abortion propaganda always focuses on the hardest of hard cases when trying to justify abortion. Rape, incest and severe handicap are weaponised to argue for "choice" and the murder of unborn children. But a new report has revealed that such tragic cases make up less than 5% of all abortions.

Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) Senior Research Associate Tessa Cox has told Live Action News that the “official state data” the organization has reviewed “shows that the vast majority of abortions, more than 95%, are for elective or unspecified reasons.”

“Less than 5% of abortions are performed because the mother or unborn baby has a physical health condition or because the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest,” Cox added.

Lozier’s report noted that just 0.4 percent of abortions are done due to rape, and 0.3 percent are done due to a risk to the woman’s life or major bodily function.

For this report, Live Action News looked at the states which collect abortion data by reason, and found the following:

Alaska (2023) – The state does not seek reasons for abortion generally, but asks the question, “Was This Termination Elected Due to the Detection of a Congenital Anomaly?” and “Type of Congenital Anomaly.”

Less than 1 percent of abortions committed in Alaska in 2022 were for “congenital anomalies” and none were reported in 2023.

Arizona (2022)

• 8,963 abortions committed because “abortion is elective.”
• 90 for fetal health/medical considerations.
• 40 for domestic violence.
• 40 for sexual assault.
• 2,611 declined to specify a reason.

2,442 abortions were listed in the “other” reasons category. These included 1,581 who “didn’t want to have children,” 150 who felt “unprepared” or “not ready” for children, 70 called it a “timing issue,” 150 gave “financial reasons,” 324 referred to “personal/emotional health,” 10 said the “father doesn’t want child/lack of support” and more. Additional reasons can be seen in the image below. Out of the 340 listed for “maternal health,” 258 were not specific and were categorized as “unknown” reasons.

Florida (2023) – Over 71 percent of total reported abortions in Florida (84,052) were reported as “elective” in 2023. This is a slight decrease from the 74 percent committed for elective reasons in 2021.

Out of the 59,901 recorded in 2023, nearly 55,000 babies aborted for “elective reasons” in Florida were killed during the first trimester. In the second trimester, 5,109 were aborted for “elective reasons.”

Less than 0.3 percent were for “Life Endangering Physical Condition (251),” and less than 1 percent were for either “incest (11)” or “rape (107)” or “fetal anomaly (141)” combined.

Minnesota (2022) – 12,175 abortions were committed in the state that year. Due to women selecting more than one reason, the data shows 14,768 abortions by reason.

This means that less than 1 percent were for rape or incest, while nearly 50 percent were because the client did not “want” children. Nearly 26 percent refused to specify a reason.

In addition, slightly more than 11 percent involved the emotional (7 percent) or physical health (4 percent) of the mother.

In the “other” category, women listed education and career, relationships, and feeling unready for children as reasons for seeking abortions.

A previous Live Action News report found that less than 1 percent of total reported abortions in Minnesota (10,136) in 2021 were committed for rape (44) or incest (11), while 54 percent of abortions were committed because the mother “d[id] not want children at this time.”

Nebraska (2023) – The state recorded 2,325 abortions committed that year. Because women may have selected more than one reason, the total reasons listed came to 2,684.

According to the report, nearly 7 percent of women claimed “contraceptive failure” led to their abortions, while over 12 percent admitted that a failure to use contraception was their reason for abortion. In addition, 42 percent of women listed “socio-economic” reasons. Nearly 23 percent “declined to answer” or give a reason.

Less than 1 percent of abortions were committed due to “maternal life endangered,” “emergency situation,” or “fetal anomaly.” These reasons combined totaled less than 2 percent of these reasons given. Sexual assault (0.63 percent) and incest (0.07 percent) were also less than 1 percent of abortions.

South Dakota (2022) – The data showed that between 2018-2022, rape and incest accounted for between <1 percent up to as high as 3 percent of abortions in the state. Physical harm to the mother was the reason given by between 2 percent or as high as 3.6 percent of women seeking abortions.

The majority of abortions between 2018-2022 were committed because:

• Mother did not desire to have the child (ranging between 63.9 percent to as high as 70.4 percent).
• Mother could not afford the child (ranging between 46.4 percent to as high as 51.8 percent).
• Emotional health was unstable (ranging from 17 percent to as high as 23.4 percent).

The state reported zero abortions in 2023.

Utah (2021) – The state reported that “In 2021, there were nine choices for ‘Reasons for an abortion.’”

The reasons selected most often were socio-economic (1,474), elective (925), or contraception failure (447). These three reasons (2,846) together made up 96 percent of the 2,978 reasons for women living in Utah to have an abortion.

Abortions reported for rape made up less than half a percent, and none were reported for maternal life endangered.

Tragically, of the babies who were aborted at or after 21-weeks of gestation, nine were for “socio-economic reasons,” five for “fetal malformation,” and 24 were “not stated.”