Medical technology has moved a step closer to allowing humans to usurp the power of God - if they've got the money, that is.
Couples are being invited to pick the embryo that best matches their idea of a perfect child by an American IVF business.
Nucleus Genomics boasts that its software allows parents pursuing IVF to “optimise their embryos” according to various genetic characteristics, including sex, health, intelligence, and appearance.
Its premium $9,999 (£7,300) service enables couples to have up to 20 embryos ‘screened’ for scores of diseases and traits. However, the company acknowledges that all its genetic predictions “are not guarantees”.
Company founder Kian Sadeghi told CBS News that its product Nucleus Embryo gives you “the full range of insights there is to know about your future child. We really think it’s the parents’ right to know.”
Parents, he said, want us to “play sports and they want us to go to the best school. They want us to be well educated. They want us to thrive. Life, I think, as a parent doesn’t just stop at ‘I want my child to be healthy'”.
He claimed that the technique ’empowered parents’ to give their children the best start in life. But, he added, “if you want 2 inches taller for your child, 3 inches taller, right, if you want a couple IQ-point difference, absolutely, by all means, do that”.
Speaking to The San Francisco Standard, Sadeghi said that he expected genetic optimisation to be seen as just another reproductive technology tool and that it would become commonplace for people to select children on the basis of predicted traits, such as IQ or eye colour.
Bioethicists Arthur Caplan and James Tabery advise prospective customers to be wary of the science behind ‘genetic optimisation’, pointing out that “there are no major genetic markers for many cancers or a truly definitive set for heart disease, let alone for intelligence, acne, body-mass index or longevity”.
Sadeghi says it would become commonplace for people to select children on the basis of predicted traits, such as IQ or eye colour.
If the claims were really true, they argued, “then there would be some deep ethical questions to ask about designer babies, the legacy of eugenics and the marketization of children”.