Pensioner on Trial for Offering Pregnant Women Help

Offering help to pregnant women now seems to be illegal in Madhouse Britain! A retired medical researcher from Bournemouth is being prosecuted for holding up a sign within an abortion clinic buffer zone reading “Here to talk if you want to”.

The pensioner from Dorset and former medical researcher at Southampton’s University Hospital Trust, Livia Tossici-Bolt, 62, stands accused of violating the local public space protection order (PSPO) in place around the a British Pregnancy Advisory Service abortion clinic in Bournemouth.

The Local Authority issued a Fixed Penalty Notice, which Tossici-Bolt refused to pay, claiming that she did not breach the PSPO, and had the right, under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act which protects freedom of speech, to offer consensual conversations.

Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council have proceeded to charge the volunteer, who awaits a trial date at Poole Magistrates’ Court.

Tossici-Bolt said: “We all condemn harassment. But ‘buffer zones’ are going so far even to criminalise activities which are peaceful and helpful. For several years now, I have been offering a helping hand to women who would like to consider other options to abortion, and pointing them to options where they can receive financial and practical support, if that’s what they would like”.

“There’s nothing wrong with offering help. There’s nothing wrong with two adults engaging in a consensual conversation on the street. I shouldn’t be treated like a criminal just for this”.

Recently, Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council had to apologise for causing the same woman to feel “distressed and harassed” when police officers wrongfully attempted to move her from a public street on another occasion.

Tossici-Bolt was standing by herself holding a sign reading “Pregnant? Need help?” outside of the bounds of a buffer zone.

Police officers confronted her and accused her of standing inside the “buffer zone”, which criminalises acts of “approval/disapproval… with respect to issues related to abortion services”.

The authorities have since admitted that she was not within the “buffer zone” but claimed the map she brought with her to indicate as much was “confusing“. The map was a copy of the map found on the council’s own website.

Livia was interrogated for praying and offering charitable help even outside of a buffer zone on one occasion – exposing the reality of the slippery slope of censorship. If the state is allowed to criminalise the mere holding of pro life viewpoints within certain public spaces, on what basis can we object to criminalisation in all public spaces?