Committing suicide or leaving your family with a huge tax bill. That's the grim 'choice' facing many elderly people in Britain if the Assisted Suicide Bill becomes law.

The gruesome trade in the body parts of aborted babies has been exposed yet again in a series of emails published by the New York Post.

The emails discuss fetal tissue like any other commodity such as sugar or rice, nonchalantly negotiating for fetuses up to 23 weeks old from elective abortions. A heavily-redacted so-called “Research Plan” submitted to the University of California San Diego (UCSD) Institutional Review Board and approved in 2018 states scientists wanted 2,500 fetuses from up to almost the sixth month of gestation for experimentation. 

“We will collect tissues from fetuses ranging from 4 to 23 weeks gestational age from subjects undergoing elective surgical pregnancy termination at Planned Parenthood in San Diego,” the plan states. Although selling fetal tissue is illegal, donating it is not illegal. The contract between UCSD and Planned Parenthood appears to allow Planned Parenthood to retain “intellectual property rights relating to the” fetal tissue, although it also does not grant UCSD the independent right to “commercialize” the tissue. The fetuses were taken to Perionatal Repository at UCSD to be researched.

Despite all the pro-abortion hysteria, new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows abortions only dropped 2 percent the year the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade.

“Among 47 reporting areas with data each year during 2013–2022, from 2021 to 2022, the number of abortions decreased 2%, the abortion rate decreased 3%, and the abortion ratio decreased 2%,” the CDC reported on Nov. 27. “From 2013 to 2022, the number of abortions decreased 5%, the rate decreased 10%, and the ratio increased 1%.”

In June 2022, the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade in a case called Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

While saving even 2% of potential victims is an improvement on the situation before, the stark reality is that 600,000 totally innocent babies, each made in the image of God, were poisoned or torn limb-from-limb in the USA in 2022 alone.

This is even more than the 500,000 murdered in the same way and in the same year in Russia. So if the current tensions between the two nuclear super powers leads to nuclear Armageddon, it might just be God's way of saying "Enough is Enough". 

The National Science Foundation (NSF) spent more than $2 billion of taxpayers’ money imposing “woke” ideology on scientific research over the course of the Biden administration, according to a new report from the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation.

“3,483 grants, more than ten percent of all NSF grants and totaling over $2.05 billion in federal dollars, went to questionable projects that promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) tenets or pushed onto science neo-Marxist perspectives about enduring class struggle,” the report found. Those grants fell into five categories: “Status, Social Justice, Gender, Race, and Environmental Justice.” Perhaps most significantly, the Biden administration raised DEI’s share of total NSF disbursements from 0.29 percent in 2021 to more than 27 percent as of April 2024.

Highlights include $2 million to address “anti-black racism” in engineering curricula at University of California Berkeley and the University of South Florida, and a projected $786,285 price tag for a “hub for justice-centered science education” fixating on the “interwoven nature of climate justice and racial justice” at San Jose State University.

Calling the findings “only the tip of the iceberg,” University of Southern California chemist Anna Krylov told The College Fix that in “addition to these grants that are clearly dedicated to advancing the Critical Social Justice agenda (which commonly operates under the name of DEI), the ideological, non-scientific criteria are also applied to funding of technical projects…This is done either through the mandatory DEI statements or through the ‘Broader Impact’ criteria, or both.”